Marco Trungelliti vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Oct at 05:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Trungelliti vs N. Fatic

ARG
2
Win
Played
0
Win

BIH
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Trungelliti 2 - 0 Fatic
They have played 6 sets in total, with Marco Trungelliti winning 4 and Nerman Fatic winning 2. The last match between Marco Trungelliti and Nerman Fatic was at the Valencia Challenger, 07-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Marco Trungelliti getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Trungelliti | 2 |
| Fatic | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Valencia Challenger(10-07-25)
(SF) Vicenza Challenger(06-01-24)
M. Trungelliti vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,168,943 | Career Prize Money | $73,995 |
| 58.90% (599-418) | Career Total W/L | 58.49% (403-286) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 12 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
M. Trungelliti vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance shows Nerman Fatic slightly ahead with 43.96% of points won compared to Marco Trungelliti’s 42.41% in recent form. Which player's second serve strength could determine the outcome? Nerman Fatic has a slight edge here.
- Marco Trungelliti excels in the return game with 45.30% of opponent's second serves won, surpassing Nerman Fatic's 43.61%. When it comes to first serve returns, Trungelliti maintains a lead at 29.91% over Fatic’s 28.81%.
- Under pressure, Trungelliti saves 59.92% of breakpoints, outperforming Fatic, who saves 55.43%. Could this pressure resilience give Trungelliti an advantage?
- Nerman Fatic has a higher overall match win rate over the past year at 77.27%, compared to Trungelliti’s 61.11%, which suggests a strong overall form.
- Both players perform best on clay with a 62% career win rate, but Trungelliti struggles on indoor hard courts with a 38% win rate, whereas Fatic's weakest surface is grass at 0%.
- Fatic has dominated in Futures/Satellites with an 87.88% success rate, while Trungelliti has a 67.27% win rate in Challengers/ITF events, indicating differing competitive experiences.
- In their direct head-to-head match, Marco Trungelliti leads with one win, and notably secured victory in their only clash on clay in a tough three-set match.
- Trungelliti has faced stronger opponents with an average rank of 252.75, compared to Fatic's opponents averaging a rank of 359.17. Will Trungelliti’s exposure to higher-ranked opponents help him?
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Fatic’s impressive 94% win rate in deciding sets starkly contrasts with Trungelliti’s 58%, possibly tipping the scales in Fatic's favor.
Editorial Prediction (October 7, 2025, UTC):
As Marco Trungelliti and Nerman Fatic prepare for their upcoming tennis clash, several statistical insights provide a window into their potential performance. Trungelliti, with a stronger return game and significant victories in their direct encounters, shows resilience on the court. His experience against higher-ranked opponents might also be a strategic advantage.
On the other hand, Nerman Fatic's superior recent win rate and adeptness in deciding sets cannot be overlooked. His slight edge in second serve performance and robust record in Futures/Satellites competitions present a formidable challenge to Trungelliti.
Though Trungelliti's past victory over Fatic and strengths on clay are noteworthy, the overall consistency and current form of Nerman Fatic could make him the likely winner of this match.
Marco Trungelliti vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Trungelliti vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 31 | Games Won | 27 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:23:34 | Average Match Time | 2:23:34 |
| 65% (120/186) | 1st Serve % | 63% (102/162) |
| 68% (81/120) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (65/102) |
| 44% (29/66) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (27/60) |
| 67% (12/18) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (11/25) |
| 43% (70/162) | Return Points Win % | 41% (76/186) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Trungelliti Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
QF | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 ret. | ||
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | ||

M. Trungelliti vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.90% (599/418) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.49% (403/286) |
| 55.51% (1345/1078) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.51% (888/656) |
| 51.67% (12040/11261) | Games Win/Loss | 53.04% (7574/6706) |
| 54.29% (95/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 61.94% (480/295) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 34.09% (15/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.18% (19/25) |
| 39.13% (9/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2721 | Aces Total | 1568 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2633 | Total Double Faults | 1510 |
| 1:19:45 | Average Match Time | 1:19:52 |
| 534.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.74 |
| 57% (33175/57746) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23679/35628) |
| 68% (22521/33175) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15504/23679) |
| 49% (12151/24571) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5733/11949) |
| 42% (2531/6006) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1961/4201) |
| 41% (23361/57260) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15552/35990) |
| 55.10% (54/44) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 50.93% (55/53) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 57.90% (337/245) | Challenger W/L | 52.91% (118/105) |
| 67.91% (146/69) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 59% (578/980) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/661) |
| 56% (10/18) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 52% (177/338) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 61% (234/381) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/188) |
| 86% (530/458) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (393/347) |
| 14% (530/72) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (393/42) |
| 29% (487/141) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (296/57) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
